OptQC and NTT form capital and business alliance to target 1 million physical-qubit photonic quantum computer by FY2030

【Article Title】 OptQC and NTT form capital and business alliance to target 1 million physical-qubit photonic quantum computer by FY2030 【Article Body】 AI TRANSLATION This article is an AI-generated translation of the original Japanese article. For the authoritative version, please refer to the original. Read the original Japanese article → (https://quantumindex.jp/optqc-ntt-photonic-quantum-computer-partnership-2026/) OptQC and NTT have signed a capital and business alliance agreement aimed at realizing an error-tolerant photonic quantum computerphotonic quantum computer光量子コンピューター / Photonic Quantum Computer / Optical Quantum ComputerA quantum computer that performs quantum computation using photons or the quantum states of light as carriers of information.QI NotePhoton generation, loss, detection, and integration affect performance. One should consider not only the number of qubits but also loss rates and the performance of light sources and detectors. on the order of 1 million physical qubitsphysical qubitsPhysical Qubit / Physical QubitIndividual qubits that are physically created and manipulated on a quantum processor. They are also used to form logical qubits.QI NoteA large number of physical qubits does not by itself indicate practical computational capability. Error rates, connectivity, and the number of physical qubits required per logical qubit are also important.. NTT plans to make an equity investment in OptQC, and the two companies set targets to complete the design by FY2027 and realize the system by FY2030. Announcement summary In addition to the capital and business alliance, the two companies have concluded a joint research agreement running through FY2027. Their work will focus on expanding qubitqubitQubit / Quantum Bit / QubitThe basic unit of information in a quantum computer. It can represent not only 0 or 1 but also a quantum state that is a superposition of them.QI NoteHaving more qubits does not necessarily mean higher performance. Error rates, connectivity, coherence time, and the number of logical qubits are also important. counts via wavelength-division multiplexing, designing an error-tolerant photonic quantum computer, and developing an architecture for a system on the order of 1 million qubits. On the business side, their collaboration will extend beyond R&D to include identifying use cases with customer companies, building supply chains, developing software infrastructure, and social implementation. The plan is to combine OptQC’s photonic quantum computing technologies with NTT’s expertise in optical communications, networking, data centers, quantum information processing, and IOWN-related domains. The roadmap calls for delivering a system on the order of 10,000 physical qubits by FY2027, beginning hardware validation and PoCs with user companies from FY2028, advancing software infrastructure and application verification through integration with classical computers in FY2029, and aiming to realize an error-tolerant system on the order of 1 million physical qubits by FY2030. The announced qubit numbers refer to physical qubits, not logical qubitslogical qubitsLogical Qubit / Logical QubitA unit of information treated as a single qubit protected from errors by using multiple physical qubits and quantum error correction.QI NoteSimply having “created a logical qubit” does not necessarily mean fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) has been achieved. One should verify logical error rates, operational/gate performance, and scalability.. Key points • NTT plans to invest in OptQC, but the investment amount and timing have not been disclosed. • The joint research will design large-scale systems using wavelength-division multiplexing, error-tolerant system designs, and an architecture for a 1 million physical-qubit class system. • The plan is to realize a system on the order of 10,000 physical qubits by FY2027 and to begin hardware validation and PoCs with user companies from FY2028. • Co-creation with user companies and research institutions will begin from FY2026, and the intention is to start building the supply chain in FY2027. • Details such as error-correction schemes, the eventual number of logical qubits, concrete performance metrics, and the timing of commercial availability were not included in this announcement. Technical and business implications On the technical side, the significance lies in applying knowledge from optical communications—such as wavelength-division multiplexing—to photonic quantum computing, and pursuing large-scale integration in parallel with error-tolerance design. On the business side, the capital tie-up strengthens the joint research relationship, and the collaboration’s scope explicitly includes user engagement, supply chains, and software toward societal implementation. However, because the 1 million figure refers to physical qubits, evaluating practical computational capability will require disclosure of the post-error-correction logical qubit count and performance metrics. What to watch next First, whether the system design scheduled for completion by FY2027 is finalized and how concretely the error-correction approach and logical-qubit assumptions are specified will be key. Next, the realization of a 10,000-physical-qubit system and the FY2028 validation will be important for revealing performance metrics; PoCs with user companies should clarify target problems and outcomes. On the business side, whether NTT’s investment is executed and which companies and research institutions join the supply-chain buildout will be important indicators to monitor. ✍️ Quantum Index Analysis The headline number—”1 million physical qubitsphysical qubitsPhysical Qubit / Physical QubitIndividual qubits that are physically created and manipulated on a quantum processor. They are also used to form logical qubits.QI NoteA large number of physical qubits does not by itself indicate practical computational capability. Error rates, connectivity, and the number of physical qubits required per logical qubit are also important.”—is not the only thing to focus on. Joint research alone is not always a reliable gauge of a company’s commitment, but a capital tie-up implies the parties share aligned incentives. This announcement is primarily a future-oriented plan; it does not disclose investment scale or technical performance details. More important than the 1 million-physical-qubitqubitQubit / Quantum Bit / QubitThe basic unit of information in a quantum computer. It can represent not only 0 or 1 but also a quantum state that is a superposition of them.QI NoteHaving more qubits does not necessarily mean higher performance. Error rates, connectivity, coherence time, and the number of logical qubits are also important. target is the track record of technical achievements and business milestones they accumulate along the way. Related articles • Ranking the capabilities and prospects of 29 quantum companies (Summer 2026) (https://en.quantumindex.jp/%e9%87%8f%e5%ad%90%e4%bc%81%e6%a5%ad29%e7%a4%be%e3%81%ae%e5%ae%9f%e5%8a%9b%e3%81%a8%e5%b0%86%e6%9d%a5%e6%80%a7%e3%83%a9%e3%83%b3%e3%82%ad%e3%83%b3%e3%82%b0%e3%80%902026%e5%b9%b4%e5%a4%8f%e7%89%88/) • AIST G-QuAT and Chulalongkorn University sign MOU on quantum technology; OptQC CTO discusses Japan–Thailand collaboration (https://en.quantumindex.jp/g-quat-chulalongkorn-quantum-mou-optqc/) • OptQC brings photonic quantum computer “MoQuren” online at AIST G-QuAT (https://en.quantumindex.jp/optqc-moquren-launch-g-quat/) Source Read the original announcement (https://www.optqc.com/news/news/optqc-ntt-2026) If you found this article useful, please consider sharing it. ──────────────────── 【AI Evaluation Request】 Evaluate the following article critically, not based on the quality of its writing, but on its **original informational value as a specialist publication**. Do not give a high rating to summaries, paraphrases, explanations of technical terms, or generic observations such as "this will be worth watching" or "the timeline remains uncertain" if they could easily be produced by a general-purpose generative AI, even if they are well written. Use the following five-level rating scale. * **S — Advanced Original Expert Analysis**: Integrates multiple sources, comparisons, industry knowledge, or other information to provide important insights, evaluations, or a broader picture that would be difficult to obtain simply by reading the original sources individually * **A — Subject-Specific Expert Analysis**: Contains clear comparisons, reasoning, verification, or evaluation specific to the company, technology, or announcement being discussed * **B — Mainly Expert Explanation**: Provides specialist explanation or organization of the topic, but contains limited original analysis specific to the subject * **C — Organization and Summary of Primary Information**: Primarily summarizes primary information, but provides some added value through human editing, organization, or supplementary explanation * **D — AI-Level Summary and Formatting**: Offers little beyond the summarization and formatting of primary information that could be produced by a general-purpose generative AI, with almost no original analysis or informational value **Original reporting, proprietary data, original calculations, or the discovery of new facts are not required for an S rating.** An article may qualify for S if it compares and integrates multiple publicly available sources to provide important insights or a broader picture that readers could not easily obtain by reading those sources individually. However, do not give an S rating merely because the article contains a large amount of information, covers many subjects, or uses extensive technical terminology. In particular, consider the following points. * Does the article contain information or perspectives that would be difficult to obtain simply by reading the original announcement? * Does it contain comparisons, reasoning, verification, or evaluation specific to the subject? * Does it integrate multiple pieces of information to provide a new understanding or broader picture? * Could the content easily be produced by a general-purpose generative AI? * Are you avoiding giving a high rating merely because the article uses technical terminology or headings such as "Analysis" or "Key Points"? In your response, first briefly show the **S–D rating scale above**, and then clearly indicate **where this article falls within that scale**. Then briefly explain the following. * **Rating for this article: S / A / B / C / D** * **Reason for the rating** * **Specific passages that qualify as original analysis** If you are uncertain between two ratings, choose the lower one rather than the higher one.

OptQC and NTT have signed a capital and business alliance agreement aimed at realizing an error-tolerant photonic quantum computerphotonic quantum computer光量子コンピューター / Photonic Quantum Computer / Optical Quantum ComputerA quantum computer that performs quantum computation using photons or the quantum states of light as carriers of information.QI NotePhoton generation, loss, detection, and integration affect performance. One should consider not only the number of qubits but also loss rates and the performance of light sources and detectors. on the order of 1 million physical qubitsphysical qubitsPhysical Qubit / Physical QubitIndividual qubits that are physically created and manipulated on a quantum processor. They are also used to form logical qubits.QI NoteA large number of physical qubits does not by itself indicate practical computational capability. Error rates, connectivity, and the number of physical qubits required per logical qubit are also important.. NTT plans to make an equity investment in OptQC, and the two companies set targets to complete the design by FY2027 and realize the system by FY2030.

Announcement summary

In addition to the capital and business alliance, the two companies have concluded a joint research agreement running through FY2027. Their work will focus on expanding qubitqubitQubit / Quantum Bit / QubitThe basic unit of information in a quantum computer. It can represent not only 0 or 1 but also a quantum state that is a superposition of them.QI NoteHaving more qubits does not necessarily mean higher performance. Error rates, connectivity, coherence time, and the number of logical qubits are also important. counts via wavelength-division multiplexing, designing an error-tolerant photonic quantum computer, and developing an architecture for a system on the order of 1 million qubits. On the business side, their collaboration will extend beyond R&D to include identifying use cases with customer companies, building supply chains, developing software infrastructure, and social implementation. The plan is to combine OptQC’s photonic quantum computing technologies with NTT’s expertise in optical communications, networking, data centers, quantum information processing, and IOWN-related domains. The roadmap calls for delivering a system on the order of 10,000 physical qubits by FY2027, beginning hardware validation and PoCs with user companies from FY2028, advancing software infrastructure and application verification through integration with classical computers in FY2029, and aiming to realize an error-tolerant system on the order of 1 million physical qubits by FY2030. The announced qubit numbers refer to physical qubits, not logical qubitslogical qubitsLogical Qubit / Logical QubitA unit of information treated as a single qubit protected from errors by using multiple physical qubits and quantum error correction.QI NoteSimply having “created a logical qubit” does not necessarily mean fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) has been achieved. One should verify logical error rates, operational/gate performance, and scalability..

Key points

• NTT plans to invest in OptQC, but the investment amount and timing have not been disclosed.
• The joint research will design large-scale systems using wavelength-division multiplexing, error-tolerant system designs, and an architecture for a 1 million physical-qubit class system.
• The plan is to realize a system on the order of 10,000 physical qubits by FY2027 and to begin hardware validation and PoCs with user companies from FY2028.
• Co-creation with user companies and research institutions will begin from FY2026, and the intention is to start building the supply chain in FY2027.
• Details such as error-correction schemes, the eventual number of logical qubits, concrete performance metrics, and the timing of commercial availability were not included in this announcement.

Technical and business implications

On the technical side, the significance lies in applying knowledge from optical communications—such as wavelength-division multiplexing—to photonic quantum computing, and pursuing large-scale integration in parallel with error-tolerance design. On the business side, the capital tie-up strengthens the joint research relationship, and the collaboration’s scope explicitly includes user engagement, supply chains, and software toward societal implementation. However, because the 1 million figure refers to physical qubits, evaluating practical computational capability will require disclosure of the post-error-correction logical qubit count and performance metrics.

What to watch next

First, whether the system design scheduled for completion by FY2027 is finalized and how concretely the error-correction approach and logical-qubit assumptions are specified will be key. Next, the realization of a 10,000-physical-qubit system and the FY2028 validation will be important for revealing performance metrics; PoCs with user companies should clarify target problems and outcomes. On the business side, whether NTT’s investment is executed and which companies and research institutions join the supply-chain buildout will be important indicators to monitor.

✍️ Quantum Index Analysis

The headline number—”1 million physical qubitsphysical qubitsPhysical Qubit / Physical QubitIndividual qubits that are physically created and manipulated on a quantum processor. They are also used to form logical qubits.QI NoteA large number of physical qubits does not by itself indicate practical computational capability. Error rates, connectivity, and the number of physical qubits required per logical qubit are also important.”—is not the only thing to focus on. Joint research alone is not always a reliable gauge of a company’s commitment, but a capital tie-up implies the parties share aligned incentives.

This announcement is primarily a future-oriented plan; it does not disclose investment scale or technical performance details. More important than the 1 million-physical-qubitqubitQubit / Quantum Bit / QubitThe basic unit of information in a quantum computer. It can represent not only 0 or 1 but also a quantum state that is a superposition of them.QI NoteHaving more qubits does not necessarily mean higher performance. Error rates, connectivity, coherence time, and the number of logical qubits are also important. target is the track record of technical achievements and business milestones they accumulate along the way.

Related articles

• Ranking the capabilities and prospects of 29 quantum companies (Summer 2026)
• AIST G-QuAT and Chulalongkorn University sign MOU on quantum technology; OptQC CTO discusses Japan–Thailand collaboration
• OptQC brings photonic quantum computer “MoQuren” online at AIST G-QuAT

Source

Read the original announcement